A medication branded as a vaccine supports the narrative that it will prevent the spread of infections disease. This is misleading. It might seem that “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” but the issue is forced compliance with a medication. Why not call statins vaccines so we can require them for everybody? Why should anyone care if statins are named, labeled, branded as vaccines. It does not matter, a rose is a rose, as long as we don’t expect them to prevent cardiovascular disease in people who don’t take them who live around people that do. We don’t force everyone to comply.
If a medication is to be labeled a vaccine, and then force the substance on the population, a higher standard of efficacy is required. The drug should be demonstrated not only to be effective in the individual, the standard for a drug, but to prevent the spread of illness.
We should not say the substance is a vaccine and therefor it will prevent the spread of disease. Call it a drug, prove that it prevents spread and then require its use.
The COVID vaccines in the new and unproven science of the label, vaccine refers to were never demonstrated to prevent the spread of the COVID virus. It was a mistake to think that they would.
The jump to this assumption was made by manufacturing a new type of vaccine science. It was never demonstrated that these new substances prevented the spread of the virus. There is no doubt that the COVID virus was spread by the mistaken impression that using these new substances labeled vaccines would prevent the spread of the COVID virus. In New Zealand where the entire population was vaccinated the COVID virus still spread in epidemic fashion. This lead to the downfall of the prime minister Jacinda Ardern who made a fool of herself and her supporters. She now lives in Australia.